Lotus Software GM Bob Picciano has grown tired of the "hot wind" blowing out of Redmond carrying claims that Exchange is displacing Notes and is singling out CEO Steve Ballmer and COO Kevin Turner as the main culprits spreading "ridiculous and fabricated" information. They are still utilizing capabilities from other aspects of the Lotus portfolio," said Picciano. Exchange alternatives: Front ends and back endsA look at Exchange 2010 "Microsoft is making claims in the marketplace around 4.7 million people have exchanged e-mail from Notes to Exchange and that is just a ridiculous fabricated figure," said Picciano, who took the reins at Lotus in 2008. "Every time they sell a [client access license] they count that as a competitive migration." "People need to recognize that Kevin Turner and Steve Ballmer have blown a lot of hot wind from Washington and there is not much substance or truth to what they are espousing in the marketplace," Picciano said. "They were so bold as to say there are entire countries that have migrated off of Notes and that is utterly ridiculous." Picciano says all the talk has "got me pretty worked up that they would be so bold to make such erroneous statements and not be challenged." The Lotus Software GM says many of the reference companies cited by Microsoft when it made its "4.7 million people" comment in July "are still licensing Lotus Notes technology and still utilizing e-mail and applications from Lotus.

At Microsoft's annual meeting this summer for financial analysts, Turner heaped on more numbers during his presentation at the event. "We've taken out almost 13 million Lotus Notes [seats] the past three years. … Now, the thing that I would tell you is there's still 15 — we count — there's still 15 million out there." He cited SharePoint Server as the "fastest-growing, hottest product in the history of Microsoft," and pegged it as a catalyst in the fight against IBM. Picciano said the counter was last week's news that U.S. Bank was replacing Microsoft's SharePoint platform by standardizing on the Notes 8.5 client and would roll out Lotus Connections social networking tools, the Sametime real-time platform and Lotus Quickr, which is IBM's alternative to SharePoint. He said PNC Bank and Continental Tire are joining U.S. Bank in getting rid of Microsoft's Exchange, Office and SharePoint. On Tuesday, Picciano threw out his own numbers saying a total to 15,421 companies have picked IBM over Microsoft since 2008 in the worldwide integrated collaborative environment market as defined by IDC. In addition, Picciano says customers are expanding their investment in Lotus software and he cited as examples Accenture, BASF, Chrysler, Coca-Cola, Colgate-Palmolive, Continental AG, Finishline, General Motors, GlaxoSmithKline, Gruppo Amadori, KBC Bank, Nationwide, Novartis, Phillips Electronics and PNC Bank. In January, Picciano said more than 12,000 new companies in 2008 bought their first Notes/Domino licenses. People understand what Kevin's motivation is and the prancing around in front of partners and talking about this.

And he said half of the Fortune global 100 are Notes/Domino users. "It's important to put [Microsoft's claims] into perspective and call it what it is, a bunch of fabrication," Picciano said. "Kevin is feeling that he is under a bit of pressure. It's duplicitous and overshadows the real truth." Follow John on Twitter.

A Palm Pre user is suing Palm and Sprint Nextel, alleging they caused him to lose most of the data from his phone, and he wants to turn the suit into a class action. Palm and Sprint last month said "a small number of customers" had had trouble transferring their data from Palm Profiles to new Palm devices and that they were working on a solution. The suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, in San Jose, is the latest black eye for the Palm Profile cloud-based synchronization service, which debuted with the company's webOS on the Pre earlier this year. The system is designed to let users back up contacts, calendars, memos and other data from their webOS devices to Palm's servers once every 24 hours.

There is no built-in mechanism for backing up to a PC. Jason Standiford of San Francisco filed suit on Friday, claiming that he had returned a defective Palm Pre to a Sprint store last month and expected to get all of his contacts, memos and Internet bookmarks back from his Palm Profile online after synchronizing the replacement device. That data is supposed to be available for downloading to a new device if necessary. It was the fourth time he had returned a defective Pre, according to the complaint (PDF). When he synchronized the replacement device with his Palm Profile, only four contacts were left of the hundreds that had been on his previous phone, the suit alleges. Palm Profile restored only three of his memos and none of his bookmarks, the suit says. Two of those were for Sprint customer service and two were recently added entries. Returning to the Sprint store the next day, he found they still had his old phone and asked them to restore the data stored on it, but the attempt failed and deleted all the data on that device.

The data on the defective Pre was the only backup of Standiford's original information because Palm always overwrites the previous day's backup, the suit alleges. Sprint later tried again to restore the data to the new phone and was able to produce some of it, but not all, the suit says. The suit charges Palm and Sprint, as well as 50 unnamed individuals, with breach of contract, negligence and violation of three California business laws. It also alleges the companies failed to invest in the hardware, software, procedures, security and other resources needed to make sure the system would perform reliably. "Despite the confidence Palm and Sprint have placed in their backup systems and Palm's servers, numerous WebOS users have suffered catastrophic data loss as a result of failed backups or overwriting of previously stored data," the complaint says. The companies deceived consumers by concealing the potential problems caused by inadequate preparation for server problems, according to the complaint. Standiford and his attorneys want the court to certify the suit as a class action on behalf of all users of webOS devices, including the Pre and Palm Pixi, as well as the set of users who have lost data because of Palm's synchronization problems.

Representatives from Palm and Sprint did not immediately respond to requests for comment. They are seeking monetary and injunctive relief.

PHOENIX - While hosted cloud computing may be all the rage for reducing cost of ownership and management, IT managers say hosted storage services present dramatic security challenges and legal implications that need to be considered. For example, many confuse cloud computing with pure server and storage virtualization or simply backing up data to a remote site. Arthur Lessard, chief information security officer at toy manufacturer Mattel Inc., in El Segundo, Calif., said during a presentation at Storage Networking World on Wednesday that cloud computing is appealing, even if many end users don't know what the word "cloud" means.

True cloud services should be characterized by grid-architected hosts with central management, applications that can be ported seamlessly from system to system, capacity that is easily provisioned and significant data redundancy, he said. "We're talking software as a service," Lessard said. The lack of auditing capabilities may affect the ability to record user logins, administrative actions and data writes, Lessard said. "What I can't find out is who has been reading the data files, and ... depending on what business you're in, that might be important," he said. When storage is hosted offsite in a virtualized server and disk array environment, cloud computing presents real limitations around authentication, and auditing - especially auditing of logging. There is also not usually any indication of login anomalies, such as repetitive attempts to log into your site under an incorrect name and password. With respect to authentication, or who sets up the accounts and what control you have over accounts and how they're provisioned, most vendors offer self-registration into your applications, "and that can have holes," Lessard said. "Most authentication in a cloud environment is done through user name and password only, so if I had a nifty two-factor authentication set up or biometrics, it's no longer offered," he said.

That information is kept by the vendor and is usually part of a contract negotiation process. Most service provider also have restrictions against penetration testing of the cloud by their customers. "To be honest, I can't blame the vendor because by doing penetration testing against their environment for your applications, it could impact someone else's applications," he said. "Remember, it's a cloud, and you don't have a lot of control over where my stuff is running or where it sits." Hackers can also exploit security holds associated with hardware and software cloning in virtual server environments. When operating systems are cloned in virtual environments, where new servers and software are stamped out to meet user demand, service providers may use pseudo-random number generators, which will pass back values that look random and for the most part are spread out over a range, but they aren't random and can be predictable, Lessard said. Most operating systems have unique or personalized components when they're installed on hardware, and the OSes rely on the hardware to generate random numbers for public and private encryption key pairs and user IDs, even when they're being cloned onto new systems. At the last Black Hat hackers convention, there was an attack proposed that would exploit resources in the cloud based on pseudo-random number generation. "If you have multiple systems, and they're all cloned and you have some idea of when a particular instance was cloned and created, you can start making some pretty good guesses about the pseudo-random number generator in that operating system, and that means you can start making some pretty good guesses about public and private key pairs that got generated when an operating system got cloned." One of the stickier legal ramifications of storing data with a cloud service provider falls under the government's right to search and seize that information during the course of a criminal investigation.

Because one company's data may be kept on the same disk as another's by a service provider, a criminal investigation could expose your data to authorities or simply limit your ability to access data through that cloud service provider, Lessard added. "Essentially, you're losing your right to answer warrants served by the government," he said. "To use a technical term, cloud computing is probably going to give your legal department the heebie jeebies." Other IT managers also had security concerns about cloud services, some of whom overcame them after becoming SaaS customers and others who weren't convinced the security around such services is sufficiently mature. According to Lessard, the U.S. government has also asserted that it has a right to serve a warrant to a third party service provider in order to see your data on their systems and not notify that provider's customers that it has served the warrant prior to the search. Gordon Peterson, director of information technology for the city of Carlsbad, Calif., recently began using Microsoft's Live Mesh cloud computing service to host collaborative applications, such as Exchange, Office Communicator and Live Meeting in order to spend less time on maintaining back office systems and more time on technology innovation. A trip to Microsoft's hosting facilities helped alleviate those concerns. "Their procedures are very similar to ours," he said. "They told me that if they mess up, the online community is unforgiving." Norton Healthcare Inc., a private, nonprofit hospital system based in Louisville, Ky., is in the middle of rolling out virtualized servers, desktops and storage to serve four acute care hospitals and other health care facilities in Kentucky and southern Indiana. Peterson, who has a staff of 25, said he definitely had security concerns, mainly around Microsoft employees who would be able to see internal e-mail traffic. "We do have justice system traffic, after all," he said. "But I think what helped was realizing somebody else can probably do security better than I can." Peterson said his main concern was Microsoft's hiring and firing procedures and whether employee background checks were thorough.

Brian Comp, associate vice president of technology at Norton Healthcare, said cloud computing, with its ease of use is definitely in the hospital's future, just not the near future. It's about having data offsite. Comp said over the next five years, as cloud computing providers and the technology mature, it will become more reliable and secure, allowing him to put non-clinical systems on a distributed architecture. "I wouldn't say I'm uneasy about security in the cloud, but I do have reservations about it. I just want certain assurances. Nobody wants to be on the front page of a newspaper because of security problems," he said. "But I do think cloud vendors will work that out over time."

California TV shoppers are going green - whether they like it or not. However, not everyone is excited about the regulation's possible impact. On Wednesday, the California Energy Commission voted unanimously to apply a new standard requiring TVs up to 58-inches in screen size sold in the state to eat up 33 percent less electricity than they do currently by 2011 and 49 percent less by 2013. The move is a first-ever clamp down on TV set sales in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Representatives for the consumer electronics industry have blasted the measure saying that the new rules will drive up the cost of HDTVs for state residents, result in the loss of California-based jobs, and limit the number of innovative HDTV features available to California TV owners. The California regulation takes effect Jan. 1, 2011. Despite the lingering energy crisis, California is the first state to take action of this kind. The new regulation does not impact TVs currently on retail shelves. Although the U.S. government has guidelines such as Energy Star in place for PCs and other computers, there is no federal energy efficiency standard for TVs. Impact on Sales and Price Unclear Since the new energy rules have just been passed, many of its future implications remain unknown. What loopholes might exist?

How will flat panel TV makers such as Sony, Samsung, and Panasonic handle compliance with the California law? Can California residence buy a power hungry TV over the Internet that doesn't meet California's standards and get away with it? TVs with screen sizes larger than 58 inches now account for no more than 3 percent of all TVs sold, according industry statistics. Will manufacturers try to elude the law by focusing sales and promotions on larger TVs with screen sizes greater than 58 inches. Most significantly, how much will it cost TV makers to obey the energy efficiency regulations, and how much of those costs will be passed along to consumers? Instead of allowing customers to choose the products they want, the Commission has decided to impose arbitrary standards that will hamper innovation and limit consumer choice.

Not Everyone Excited The Consumer Electronics Association, which member include some of the biggest TV makers, says this new regulation is "unprecedented and unnecessary." Jason Oxman, CEA's senior vice president of industry affairs blasted CEC in a statement released to its Web site Wednesday: "Simply put, this is bad policy-dangerous for the California economy, dangerous for technology innovation and dangerous for consumer freedom. It will result in higher prices for consumers, job losses for Californians, and lost tax revenue for the state." You can read CEA's entire statement here. According to California's energy commission, state residents are expected to save $8.1 billion in energy costs over a 10-year period as a result of the regulation. What the CEA fails to do in its attack against the California Energy Commission is explain how jobs will be lost, why consumers will pay more for HDTVs, and what innovative features will be missing from HDTVs sold in California. Additionally, California commission says the new restrictions will be like taking 500,000 cars off its roads by reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 3 million metric tons a year. (PC World's Tom Spring contributed to this report)

A smart people smack-down is set to start next week where thousands of university computer researchers will pit their brains and machines in a grueling battle of logic, strategy, and mental endurance. Layer 8 Extra: 15 genius algorithms that aren't boring During the competition, ten to twelve problems are attempted in a five hour period. The 34th annual IBM-sponsored Association for Computer Machinery (ACM) International Collegiate Contest (ICPC) pits teams of three university students against eight or more complex, real-world problems, with a nerve-wracking five-hour deadline.

The problems are of varying difficulty and flavor. The goal is that every team solve two problems, that every problem is solved, and that no team solve them all, according to ACM. Contests in the past have included problems that searched for a missing boat at sea, triangulated the location of a faulty transmitter, computed golf handicaps, stacked pipe of varying diameters in a fixed width bin, coded or decoded messages, printed braille, sought an exit to a maze, processed satellite images and solved a math problem. ACM says it wants two problems that could be solved in an hour by a first or second year student, two that could be solved in an hour by a third year student, and two that will likely determine the winners. Problems are presented with no more than a page of text, a helpful illustration, a sample input set with and accepted output set, ACM states. And judging is relentlessly strict, IBM says.

Teammates collaborate to rank the difficulty of the problems, deduce the requirements, design test beds, and build smart software systems that solve the problems under the intense scrutiny of expert judges. The students are given a problem statement, not a requirements document. Each incorrect solution submitted is assessed a time penalty. They are given an example of test data, but they do not have access to the judges' test data and acceptance criteria. The team that solves the most problems in the fewest attempts in the least cumulative time is declared the winner. Some problems require a knowledge and understanding of advanced algorithms.

For a well-versed computer science student, some of the problems require precision only. Still others are simply too hard to solve - except for the world's brightest problem-solvers, according to IBM. The Battle of the Brains is the largest and most prestigious computing competition in the world, with more than tens of thousands of students from universities in approximately 90 countries on six continents participating. Previously, the 2009 ACM-ICPC World Finals took place in Stockholm, Sweden, where a team from St. Petersburg University of Information Technology, Mechanics and Optics in Russia emerged as the world champion for the second year in a row. Since IBM began sponsoring the contest in 1997, participation has grown from 1,100 to more than 7,100 teams. Regional bouts will begin in the United States on October 18 and continue through December, sweeping from continent to continent.

Only 100 three-person teams will advance to the World Finals on February 5, 2010 hosted by Harbin Engineering University in Harbin, China. "The ACM-ICPC affords students the opportunity to showcase their talents and gain exposure among top recruiters," said Dr. Bill Poucher, ICPC Executive Director and Baylor University Professor. "The contest is also a forum for advancing technology in an effort to better accommodate the growing needs of the future."

China called for a cleanup of mobile porn Web sites on Wednesday, blaming their rise on high-speed mobile data services, deployment of which has otherwise been a point of pride for the country. This year the country has also closed thousands of Web sites and arrested dozens in a campaign against online pornography that is increasingly shifting focus to mobile Web sites. "Lawless people have begun using the full commercial deployment of 3G and its faster download speeds for pictures and videos... to spread obscene and pornographic content," Su Jinsheng, an engineer in China's IT ministry, said in a speech, according to a transcript on the ministry Web site. China issued 3G (third generation) mobile network licenses to its three mobile carriers early this year, and the number of 3G users in China has slowly climbed since then. A cleanup is needed to "protect the healthy growth of the next generation and purify the social environment," he said.

But owners of mobile porn Web sites have been able to evade authorities through technical tactics such as frequently switching domain names and IP (Internet Protocol) addresses, Su said. China sees its long-delayed rollout of 3G services as a step toward its goal of becoming a global technology power. Counter-tactics being used by authorities include a blacklist to prevent pornographic Web sites from reappearing online and the design of content-filtering technology to help network operators themselves block obscene content, he said, giving a rare official glimpse into how Chinese regulators control information on the Internet. Earlier this year Google had a row with Chinese authorities over pornographic search results that ultimately led to Google.com and other Google services being briefly blocked in the country. Pornography is illegal in China and authorities have long seen it as a scourge on the country's culture.

Driven by increased crackdowns on BitTorrent sites such as The Pirate Bay, software pirates are fast-moving their warez to file-hosting Web sites. Hyperlinks to the software can then be distributed by pirates via Web sites, instant messages, or social media sites such as Twitter, said Vic DeMarines, CEO of anti-piracy software vendor V.I. Labs. "It's incredibly easy to use. Sites such as RapidShare, Megaupload, and Hotfile let anonymous users upload large files such as cracked software for free. And what you get is essentially your own private FTP server," DeMarines said.

These memberships, such as the 30-day premium access for $6.99 Euros at Rapidshare, let users download files immediately and without any caps on bandwidth. While sites such as RapidShare allow free downloads, they make their money by charging heavy downloaders for premium memberships. Trade in pirated digital goods , whether it is movies, music or e-books or software, is what drives the popularity and business model of firms like RapidShare. A spokeswoman for Cham, Switzerland-based Rapidshare declined to comment on the V.I. Labs report, saying she would need more information. The site told The New York Times earlier this year that it hosted 10 petabytes of data and up to 3 million downloaders at a time . The Association of American Publishers estimates that half of the pirated books found by its members were linked to Rapidshare. "There's a lot of money being made," said DeMarines. "Without hosting pirated goods, I'm not sure what their revenue model would be." According to a recent investigation by V.I. Labs into the availability of pirated software from a sample of 43 vendors, 100% were on RapidShare.

The site is already among the top twenty most popular in the world, according to Alexa. Though Rapidshare has faced lawsuits related to piracy, DeMarines says it and other file-hosting sites are tricky to prosecute legally becuase uploaders are not required to register or identify themselves. Uploads and downloads to Rapidshare account for 5% of all Internet traffic globally, says German networking vendor Ipoque. Also, Rapidshare tries to distance itself from any knowledge of the pirated goods by not filtering or monitoring the content on its servers. "For us, everything is just a file, no matter what," a spokeswoman told The Times in March. The company even grants certain organizations direct access into their service, so that they can go ahead and delete the hyperlinks and pirated files themselves, DeMarines said.

DeMarines said Rapidshare does comply with the Safe Harbor Provisions of the U.S.' Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) by quickly taking down pirated files when notified by the copyright holders. Peer-to-peer networking (P2P) does still remain the largest channel for distributing pirated software, movies and other digital content. The most popular network remains BitTorrent , which is used by six out of 10 P22 users, V.I. Labs said. Ipoque said it enables between 43% to 70% of piracy, depending on the region of the world. eDonkey is a distant second, with 20% share, despite hosting almost 900,000 users and 77 million files at any given time. But file-hosting is growing much faster, Ipoque said, already enabling between 15% to 35% of digital piracy, depending on the region of the world.

Once-popular Gnutella is ranked third, with a market-share in the single digits. DeMarines said he expects file-hosting sites to eventually supplant P2P. "P2P is on its way down. Other long-running methods for distributing warez are either stagnant or shrinking. They're too visible, and so the copyright organizations are going to take these BitTorrent tracker sites out," he said. Usenet newsgroups, for instance, have lost popularity due to the large amount of pornography and malware mingled in with the warez, DeMarines said. Internet Relay Chat (IRC) is "not favored" as a way to transmit files, though announcements and links on IRC to warez hosted on file-hosting sites is growing, DeMarines said.

In the days leading up to NASA's crashing of two halves of a space probe into the moon, doubters turned to the Internet to express fears that the lunar bombing would have negative effects on the Earth. In a quest to find out if there's water on the moon , NASA sent two separated halves of a spacecraft crashing into a permanently dark crater on the south pole of the moon this morning. Scientists and astronomers were quick to step forward to refute any rumors and quell concerns, but rumors are still circulating online. The crashes were meant to send up a huge debris plume that could be measured and analyzed for evidence of water ice hiding in the cold, dark crater.

But detractors were quick to post online warnings about possible negative effects of the experiment. With NASA still hopeful to one day create a viable human outpost on the moon , it would be helpful for anyone there to find water rather than haul it up from Earth. Amy Ephron, an author and screenwriter, wrote an article for the Huffington Post earlier this week, questioning NASA for taking the risks associated with sending two spacecraft crashing into the surface of the moon. "Who did the risk assessment? Ephron was far from alone in her concerns. I mean, what if something goes wrong?" asked Ephron. "I could say something scientifically lame and ask, 'What if it gets thrown off its axis?' or something funny and suggest something (that I actually sort of believe), like, 'What if it somehow throws off the astrology?' Or that we're not risking - as we have the earth with continued experiments of this kind - sending the solar system out of balance. The Chicago Surrealist Movement posted an online petition , which was signed by 560 people, calling for NASA to halt the bombing of the moon.

Faith Vilas, director of the MMT Observatory , said she's been amazed by such negative reactions to the mission. And people against the LCROSS mission started their own Twitter presence with @helpsavethemoon . While some people said they felt NASA's plan was simply too aggressive an attack on the Earth's orbiter, some claimed that the impacts would change the Earth's tides, throw the moon off its axis or even affect women's menstrual cycles. There's simply no danger, she added. "The moon is impacted by nature and meteors all the time," said Vilas. "Nature has done much more damage to the moon than we just did. What we did was nothing. We were not likely to have any effect on the moon at all.

We didn't have much of an impact at all." Bruce Betts, director of projects at The Planetary Society , said in an email to Computerworld that this morning's crashes will have no negative impact on the moon or the Earth. "The spacecraft are far too tiny compared to the moon, in fact, to have any significant effect on the moon's orbit or dynamics," he added. "The impact might be likened to a gnat hitting the windshield of a truck."

The iPhone's new defense - meant to prevent users from reaching phishing sites - is inconsistent at best, a security researcher said today, with some users getting warnings about dangerous links, while others are allowed to blithely surf to criminal URLs. Other experts said that the fickle feature is worse than no defense at all. But according to Michael Sutton, the vice president of security research at Sunnyvale, Calif.-based Zscaler, the new protection is "clearly having issues." At first, said Sutton, the anti-phishing feature was simply not working. "It was blocking nothing," Sutton claimed after testing iPhone 3.1's new tool Wednesday against a list of known fraudulent sites. Apple quietly added an anti-fraud feature to the iPhone's Safari browser with the update to iPhone 3.1 , released Wednesday.

By Thursday, things had improved, but just barely. "Yesterday, it started blocking some sites, for some users, but it was inconsistent. Apple relies on Google 's SafeBrowsing API (application programming interface) for the underlying data used to build anti-phishing and anti-malware blocking lists for the desktop edition of its Safari browser. Some sites are being blocked, others are not." That led Sutton to believe that the feature's functionality wasn't the issue, but how Apple updates users with a "blacklist" of malicious sites. Other browser makers, including Google and Mozilla, also use SafeBrowsing. "It appears some iPhones are getting timely updates [from Apple], but others are not, or are getting different [block list] feeds," Sutton said. "I'm feeling better about the feature than I was Wednesday, but clearly Apple is still have issues. URLs that are blocked by Safari in Mac OS X open and direct users to malicious pages [on the iPhone]." Like Sutton, James reported inconsistencies in the anti-fraud feature's effectiveness. "All we've come up with is that sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't," said James. "This is clearly more dangerous than no protection at all, because if users think they are protected, they are less careful about which links they click." The new feature is turned on by default in iPhone 3.1; the option to turn it off is in Settings/Safari/Security, and is listed as "Fraud Warning." Sutton, although willing to concede that Apple overall is improving its security track record, bemoaned the state of mobile security in general, and the iPhone's in particular. "The greater concern to me is that we're making the same mistakes in mobile that we made on the desktop," he said. "On the desktop, security has gotten slowly better, but [with mobile] we have a fresh start. With the [media] coverage of the problem, maybe they're resolving it, or trying to." On Thursday, researchers at Intego, a Mac-only antivirus vendor, echoed Sutton's findings. "This feature should warn users that they may be visiting a known malicious Web site and ask if they wish to continue," said Peter James, a spokesman for Intego who writes the company's Mac security blog . "However, we have extensively tested this feature, tossing dozens of phishing URLs at it, and it simply does not seem to work.

I would have thought we would have learned from our mistakes, but there's virtually no protection in mobile browsers." According to research conducted by NSS Labs, which was hired by Microsoft to benchmark different desktop browsers' ability to block malware-laden sites, Safari in Mac OS X and Windows blocked only one-in-five malicious sites . Internet Explorer and Firefox, meanwhile, blocked 80% and 27%, respectively. Last month, NSS Labs attributed the disparities between Firefox, Safari and Google - all which use SafeBrowsing as the basis for their blacklists, to differences in how each browser tweaked, then applied, the lists. Google's Chrome blocked a paltry 7% of the sites.

It's hard to understand who in their right mind would want to incur the wrath of "Triple H," the intimidating superstar of professional wrestling. The smackdown came from someone who was actually watching the wrestler's back - Lauren Dienes-Middlen. But when a poser created a fraudulent MySpace account in Triple H's name, it wasn't the wrestler that the perpetrator had to contend with. She's vice president of intellectual property at World Wrestling Entertainment, the Stamford, Conn., company that owns the trademark.

The growth of social networks has brought a variety of threats that can potentially damage a brand's good name. WWE notified MySpace, which terminated the account immediately. Most of those threats aren't new, however. The Triple H incident wasn't the first time that an impostor had commandeered the name of a trademarked WWE personality. "We've had a lot of impersonations," mostly on Facebook, MySpace and Twitter, says Dienes-Middlen. Social networks have simply become another attack vector, whether for spreading malware, launching assaults on an individual's or company's reputation, or creating impostor social networking sites that divert traffic away from the brand's legitimate sites.

In fact, it's enough of a problem that Twitter recently launched an initiative to verify some accounts. Social media cybersquatting is where domain name cybersquatting was 10 years ago, says James Carnall, manager of the cyberintelligence division at security monitoring firm Cyveillance Inc. A Good Offense To protect themselves, businesses should defensively register company brand names and trademarks - and variations on those names - on the major social networking sites, just as they do with domain names, to protect against cybersquatters, says Pamela Keeney Lina, an intellectual property lawyer at Alston & Bird LLP in Atlanta, who has written about protecting intellectual property on social networks. People use variations on brand names to open accounts on social networking sites, in hopes that companies will pay them to relinquish control of the accounts. Unlike domain names, however, social networks have no central authority like ICANN or established processes for reclaiming brand names from cybersquatters.

He points to the online market Tweexchange as a prime example of how trading in social network names is a growing business. Some impostors are simply overzealous fans, but Dienes-Middlen is more concerned about scammers and those who sell pirated videos and poor-quality knockoff WWE merchandise, which robs the company of revenue and cheapens its brands. Last year, WWE shut down 3,200 online auctions of phony WWE products with an estimated street value of $16 million to $33 million. Those sites lure users through social networks, spam, abusive search engine marketing and other channels. During one Wrestlemania pay-per-view event this spring, WWE was able to use social networking sites to identify a number of unauthorized Web sites that planned to stream the event live.

The Cost of Piracy Online counterfeiting also damages brands in other ways. It also found 8,600 sites that had made pirated copies or footage of the event available after the fact. "Counterfeiting operations are highly organized, are very global and are picking up steam because of the economy," says Liz Miller, vice president of the Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) Council. For example, some people who buy pirated copies of Microsoft Corp.'s Windows operating system may think they have legitimate copies, says Cori Hartje, senior director of the Microsoft Genuine Software Initiative. Hartje says she's seen research showing that counterfeiters today can make more money from the spyware and malware than they get from selling the pirated software itself. What they get is software that often includes embedded spyware and malware - and they expect Microsoft and its channel partners to support the product. Meanwhile, the user blames Microsoft for any problems the malware causes. "That hurts our brand," Hartje says.

Many video-sharing sites, such as YouTube, have tools available to report and take down footage that violates copyrights. At WWE, while the onus is on the corporation itself to find and shut down sites peddling pirated videos and other counterfeit wares, most sites do try to cooperate. Dienes-Middlen says the challenge isn't shutting down the sites that WWE finds, but keeping up with the new ones that continue to crop up. Dienes-Middlen thought she had things under control - until she did a test run with brand protection service MarkMonitor The losses WWE had uncovered on its own were just the "tip of the iceberg," she says. While businesses can assign employees to do that, she recommends trying a third-party monitoring service to get a handle on the problem.

Soon afterward, she went to WWE's chief operating officer to ask for additional funds to clamp down on the illicit activity. "This was something we needed to attack. Jeff Hayzlett, chief marketing officer at Eastman Kodak Co., says he has seen competitors try to hijack conversations - sometimes anonymously - with customers on the company's Twitter and blog sites. Our most valuable asset is our intellectual property," Dienes-Middlen says. "You have to protect [it] or you lose your rights to it." Social networking sites can be a launch pad for reputation attacks from competitors, customers or disgruntled employees. In one Twitter exchange between Kodak and a prospective customer, a competitor jumped in and "inundated" the inquirer with negative comments about Kodak's product while promoting his own company's offering. When a customer is publishing negative comments, he says, his preference is to have a private conversation rather than use a public forum. It was, Hayzlett says, "a rude way to participate." He has a name for Twitter users who employ such tactics: He calls them "twankers." Any time you sell a product or service, you're going to have issues like this, Hayzlett says, so Kodak hired a "chief listener." That person monitors all conversations and routes problems to the appropriate group, be it legal, IT or marketing, so that the company can follow up.

Other threats can be self-inflicted. In the time it took to delete the tweet, four people had retweeted it. "I had to reach out to them and beg them to [remove it]." Even then, the tweet may have shown up in Twitter searches. Hayzlett himself admits to prematurely posting a tweet about the impending retirement of a product. "I accidentally hit Send instead of Save and tweeted out what we had worked six months to protect," he says. Gartner Inc. analyst John Pescatore says a client that runs a campground chain had an employee who thought he'd be helpful by posting a spreadsheet on Facebook that showed which sites were available and which were booked - but it included the credit card numbers campers had given to reserve their sites. With social networks, "periodically looking at content has to be part of the cost equation," Pescatore says. Data-leak prevention tools won't find such data when it's posted outside a corporate firewall.

Some threats come from inside. That could be a big problem for WWE, since employees who know the storylines of its scripted events could spill the beans. "If those outcomes were revealed, it would destroy the experience for the fans," Dienes-Middlen says, so all WWE employees are required to sign confidentiality agreements. In an April survey of more than 2,000 U.S. employees and executives by Deloitte LLP, nearly three quarters of the employees said that it was easy to damage a company's reputation using social media - and 15% said they would post comments online if their company did something they didn't agree with. Diversionary Tactics Social networks also have been used by scammers to lure a brand's customers to malware or phishing sites - or to e-commerce sites hawking counterfeit or gray-market products. It was the third-biggest category, right behind cybersquatting or illegal use of a trademarked name, and the illegal copying of digital media content.

According to a survey by MarkMonitor, which tracks online threats for its clients, in the 12-month period ending in the second quarter of this year, phishing attacks on social networking sites increased by 164%. In a CMO Council survey of 4,500 senior marketing executives, nearly 20% of the respondents said they had been affected by online scams and phishing schemes that had hijacked brand names. The fourth category was online sales of fake products that contain deficient or dangerous ingredients. She uses a monitoring service to track and shut down cybersquatters and scam sites. Barbara Rentschler, CMO at K'nex Brands LP, sees cybersquatting, online scams and false association of its brands on other sites as the biggest threats to the toy maker's brands on the Web. Many sites that misappropriate K'nex trademarks are overseas, she says.

With so many different brand threats to contend with online, it's important to have a coordinated strategy. Most aren't malicious: They're simply businesses that hope to become K'nex distributors. Unfortunately, says Cyveillance's Carnall, many organizations take a triage approach, sending the issue to legal, IT or marketing. "They silo it," he says. Hayzlett keeps communication flowing through what he calls online councils with every department in the organization, including IT, legal and human resources. "Everyone needs to work together and understand each role. But someone needs to be keeping track of outcomes and the overall impact on the brand, he contends. "You almost need a brand intelligence officer." At Kodak, the buck stops at the CMO's desk. We work as a team," he says.

Customers are often the first to notify a business of a problem, so listen to customer service lines carefully, says Frederick Felman, CMO at MarkMonitor. Communication between marketing and IT is key. "The most powerful team would be if you connected the CMO and the CIO at the hip," Miller says. At WWE, it was fans, not staffers or a monitoring service, who first reported the Triple H imposter. "Take the complaints you get seriously," Felman advises, "and be prepared to act quickly." Rentschler says IT needs to educate colleagues in marketing about risks. IT needs to push back more when marketing plans can jeopardize brand security. If IT sees a problem and fixes it without telling anyone, "no one else will know what to look out for," she warns.

It must, for example, fight pressure to rush Web site changes through without thorough security checks. "I don't think IT does a good job of saying, 'Here's all of the IT issues with the brand upkeep,' " Rentschler says. Lynn Goodendorf, global head of data privacy at U.K.-based InterContinental Hotels Group, says she tries to focus on sensitive, confidential data. With so much online turf to monitor and so much activity in cyberspace, it's important to prioritize. But even there, you have to have realistic goals. "Mitigate your largest exposures," she says, "but don't think you can mitigate it down to zero."

VMware Inc. is having trouble getting VMware Fusion 3.0 out its download door and is getting customer complaints about timeouts and licensing problems. The alert remained on the Web site early this morning. Shortly after the software was released Tuesday for download by customers, VMware issued a support alert about its upgrade portal, blaming "overwhelming demand" for the upgrade problems. Fusion 3.0 is virtualization software that allows Windows, and other guest operating systems, to run on Intel-based Mac OS X. VMware Workstation 7 , also released Tuesday, is a virtual machine platform that supports multiple operating systems on a PC. Most of the VMware portal problems appear to be with Fusion.

In a blog post , Pat Lee, director of VMware's personal desktop products, posted the 30-day free trial key as a workaround. "Because we've seen even more demand than anticipated, the VMware Fusion upgrade portal is having significant problems keeping up with the demand," wrote Lee, in a post Tuesday afternoon. "While we have already transacted thousands of upgrades today and many people are able to get the product, I apologize immensely to those of you who are anxious to get the product immediately and are running into issues." Responded one user, Miku, in a comment field: "I'm very happy that you posted a temporary serial for us to try it out, the license server problems were driving me insane, I was really thinking I was insane." Rob Enderle, an independent IT analyst in San Jose, said the demand for the product would imply that a lot of people suddenly want to run Windows on a Mac, "so many that it is crashing VMware's servers." "VMware is largely a server company and not really used to the kinds of numbers that can be generated by a popular desktop offering. One problem was difficulty in getting activation codes for the new products. You jump from 100s for a server application to millions for a popular desktop application under load and this looks like VMware wasn't ready for this jump," Enderle said. A VMware spokesman said the company wouldn't provide details beyond what was in the blog post. The site issues may be an indication that Paul Maritz, VMware's CEO, who was appointed last year and is a longtime Microsoft veteran, may have assumed that the demand was anticipated by his staff, Enderle said. "This should be one hell of a wake-up call for him, not unusual for a new CEO, and it will remind him that he needs to test his assumptions, because what he assumes, and what turns out not to be true, can be very damaging," he said. The company was also addressing upgrade issue via a Twitter account, vmwarefusion .

The worst economic recession in decades has compelled more companies to spend less on outsourced security services and do more in-house, according to the seventh-annual Global Information Security survey, which CSO and CIO magazines conducted with PricewaterhouseCoopers earlier this year. Related podcast: IT Security Outsourcing in Decline A few years ago, technology analysts were predicting unlimited growth for managed security service providers (MSSPs). Many companies then viewed security as a foreign concept, but laws such as Sarbanes-Oxley, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (affecting financial services) were forcing them to address intrusion defense, patch management, encryption and log management. Some 7,200 business and technology executives worldwide responded from a variety of industries, including government, health care, financial services and retail.

Convinced they couldn't do it on their own, companies chose outsourcers to do it for them. Although 31 percent of respondents this year are relying on outsiders to help them manage day-to-day security functions, only 18 percent said they plan to make security outsourcing a priority in the next 12 months. Gartner estimated the MSSP market in North America alone would reach $900 million in 2004 and that it would grow another 18 percent by 2008. Then came the economic tsunami, which appears to have cast a shadow over outsourcing plans even though security budgets are holding steady. When it comes to specific functions, the shift has already begun. Respondents cited similar reductions in outsourcing of network and end-user firewalls.

Last year, 30 percent of respondents said they were outsourcing management of application firewalls, compared to 16 percent today. Companies have also cut back on outsourcing encryption management and patch management. Sixty-nine percent said they're budgeting for application firewalls, up slightly compared to the past two years. At the same time, more companies are spending money on these and other security functions. Meanwhile, more than half of respondents said they are investing in encryption for laptops and other computing devices. It was mostly due to the economic conditions more than anything else," he says. "They were certainly looking to see where cost could be reduced or eliminated.

The results surprise Mark Lobel, a partner in the security practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers. "When you think about it logically, some IT organizations have the resources and maturity to manage their operating systems and patches, but many don't," he observes. "Hopefully, the numbers simply mean IT shops have grown more mature in their security understanding." Miguel Lopez, a Los Angelas-based IT security practitioner who has worked for such companies as MSC Software and Stamps.com, observed a stark trend toward less outsourcing while at MSC (he left the company earlier this year). "The company was doing less and less outsourcing. I also hear from a few of my friends in other companies that the trend is toward doing more with internal staff." Peter Hillier, director of IT security for CMA Holdings in Ottawa, believes there are three things driving the move toward more in-house security: 1. Organizations have become more adept at do-it-yourself security since first outsourcing, though, Hillier says, "they should have done that prior to outsourcing security the first time." 2. SIM/SIEM growth has been as good for the insourcer as it is for the outsourcer. "If you can do more with less, then why pay someone else to do it?" he asks. 3. Economy is a driver, as others have noted. Smart business executives understand that they must maintain control of the big picture at all times, even if a third party is managing many of the levers. Charles Beard, SVP and chief information officer for Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC), says that no matter what drives security spending decisions, companies should understand their specific security strategies and where managed security providers can offer unique value. Keeping an eye on security service providers and the risks they are encountering is essential. "CIOs and security officers may outsource certain functions to various degrees, but they should never outsource their responsibility," Beard advises.

Microsoft stepped up promotion of Bing in China with the launch of a Web services platform for mobile phones this week, a possible step toward challenging the dominance of Google and Baidu.com in the country. Bing has not caught on in China and Microsoft has done little to promote it in the country. The Microsoft portal, an effort to spur use of its services in a market crowded by local competitors, offers downloads of mobile clients for Bing and Windows Live Messenger, along with instructions on how to use Microsoft services, including Hotmail, from a mobile phone.

However, Bing, launched in June, has grown quickly in the U.S. and attracted about 9 percent of online searches there last month, according to Internet monitoring companies. Baidu and Google together account for as much as 95 percent of online searches done in China, leaving Yahoo, a range of local search engines, and any new players like Bing to compete for the remaining slice of the market. China's online search market is dominated by local player Baidu, with Google in a distant second place. The Bing mobile client lets users search for local information such as maps, restaurant locations and weather forecasts. Bing has strong potential but will face difficulty competing with Baidu and Google in the near term, said Ben Cavender, senior analyst at China Market Research Group in Shanghai. Microsoft "will continue to strengthen and expand the service scope of its mobile Internet products," the company said in a statement.

While Baidu and Google have well-established search services for free music downloads that keep Chinese users coming back, Microsoft so far has done little to localize Bing, Cavender said. Bing did not make a list of China's top 10 most-visited search engines in August, as posted on the Web site of local online traffic analyzer CR-Nielsen.

Oracle may have accumulated a vast array of products, but it has also added value and tightly integrated them, executives said during a keynote address Monday at the OpenWorld conference in San Francisco. One demo showed how Oracle has tied the Primavera project planning products it acquired last year back to its ERP (enterprise resource planning) software. Through a series of demonstrations, Oracle officials seemed intent on answering critics who say the vendor's acquisition spree has resulted in a Frankenstein monster-like mish-mash of components. Primavera business unit head Joel Koppelman showed how the integrations could be used to balance the availability of skilled workers against project timelines. "The minute you start to delay a project, they're all affected.

Another demonstration showcased a product aimed at helping fashion companies maximize their profits. What you really want to be able to do is model those changes," he said. The software uses Fusion middleware to tie together the ProfitLogic retail software Oracle acquired in 2005 with BI (business intelligence) tools and the WebCenter portal. "The pieces matter, but fitting it together is where all the value is," said Oracle president and CFO Safra Catz. The release includes 10 new "cross-industry" packs and six new packs aimed at specific verticals. Beyond the keynote and demonstrations, Oracle on Monday also announced Application Integration Architecture Release 2.5, the latest installment of its prebuilt packs for tying together processes and applications.

Not everyone at the show was buying into Oracle's middleware pitch. Representatives of ActiveVOS, which makes a product that competes with Oracle's SOA Suite, capered on street corners outside the Moscone Center wearing comical black-and-white prisoners' garb, begging passers-by to "free" them from the alleged higher cost and constraints of owning SOA Suite.

Augmented reality apps-mobile applications that can superimpose contextual digital information on top of the real environment-have carved out a very impressive niche on the iPhone 3GS. They demonstrate new and innovative uses for smartphones with a compass, a GPS, and a camera. Today, Layar has announced the release of version 2.0 for the iPhone 3GS. Unlike special purpose augmented-reality apps that tie themselves down to a particular location and a specific need, Layar lets users choose from a wide selection of 161 different augmented reality views. They've also made quite a splash on other smartphones: Google's Android platform, for example, has a beloved augmented-reality app called the Layar Reality Browser. These layers feature familiar Web services like Wikipedia, Yelp, Google local search, Qype, Brightkite, Yellowpages.com, and Twitter.

Layar was made to provide content worldwide, limited only by what each content provider is willing to offer for a given region. There are also several lesser known directory services available to find tourism hot spots in Japan, stations in the London Underground, or the closest Tim Hortons for a traditional Canadian coffee fix. You can search through layers, view content in your augmented views as a map or a list, take screenshots in the app itself and share layers with friends. For Layar 3.0, the developers also plan to add 3D capabilities for a full 3D augmented reality experience. The developers do appreciate feedback, so be sure to let them know what you think in their blog or within the swampy morass of App Store reviews.

Thanks to the, ahem, very efficient App Store approval process, no release date for the iPhone version of 3.0 has been announced, but it will be released for Android in November. Layar 2.0 can be downloaded now from the App Store for free; it requires an iPhone 3GS running iPhone OS 3.1 or later.

TLA Systems has an important new feature on its popular PCalc and PCalc Lite calculator apps for iPhone. Censorship. That feature?

And, frankly, it's about gosh-darned time. Those of us more experienced with the 8008's and heartbreaks know all too well why a calculator profanity filter is long overdue. Nothing has haunted the American people like the knowledge that parents may be sending their children to schools in which, with a press of few buttons and some crafty calculator flipping, youngsters could be exposed to numbers that vaguely resemble the word "BOOBIES." If you've never been exposed to the 5318008 flip trick, than count yourself as lucky. The new feature is simple: If an unsuspecting mathematician types in a number that might look like a tasteless word when the calculator is flipped upside-down, PCalc will "discreetly" censor that word, saving you from the horror of inflicting yourself-or others-with inadvertent smut. Discreet. See?

In a press release, TLA Systems's James Thompson emphasized the company's commitment to family-friendly calculators, stating, "We take our responsibility to protect innocent minds very seriously." Many "calculator words" have already been defined and the good people at TLA plan on increasing this ban-list over time through software updates. It has yet to be seen if TLA will eventually implement it on OS X, though flipping your iMac over might present a challenge. The profanity filter is available now on both PCalc and PCalc Lite for the iPhone. If you or someone you know is thinking about switching over to these extra-safe calculators, TLA Systems is currently offering a coupon code that's worth $9 off the price of PCalc for OS X. More information can be found on the company's website. Now if only they'd do something about that whole wretched hive of scum and villainy called "the Internet."

This new feature, if implemented into all calculators, could likely save billions of dollars in office-space productivity.

Criminals flooded several online ad networks with malicious advertisements over the weekend, causing popular Web sites such as the Drudge Report, Horoscope.com and Lyrics.com to inadvertently attack their readers, a security company said Wednesday. The attack comes just a week after the New York Times Web site was tricked into displaying a deceptive 'scareware' advertisement for fake antivirus software from scammers pretending to be ad buyers with Vonage, an Internet telephony company. The trouble started on Saturday, when the criminals somehow placed the malicious ads on networks managed by Google's DoubleClick, as well as two others: YieldManager and ValueClick's Fastclick network, according to Mary Landesman, a senior security researcher with ScanSafe. Instead of trying to trick Web surfers into buying bogus software, these ads attacked.

Sometimes, the ads would also try to exploit a previously patched flaw in Microsoft's DirectShow software, Landesman said. "The user would have seen a very brief opening of a blank pdf window and it would be at the bottom portion of their screen," she said. They would pop up a nearly invisible window in the victim's browser that contained a maliciously encoded pdf document, which included attack code that placed a variant of the Win32/Alureon Trojan horse program on the victim's computer. The Alureon Trojan is known to download additional malware and often hijack victims' search results, she said. Between Saturday and Monday, the ads accounted for 11 percent of all Web pages blocked by ScanSafe's Web filtering software, a sign that many people were being presented with the malicious ads. The pdf attacks apparently only affected victims with out-of-date versions of Adobe's Reader or Acrobat software, she added. And because the pdf pages were modified slightly every time they were displayed, most antivirus products didn't detect them.

Earlier this year criminals placed similar ads on the home page of technology trade magazine eWeek, whose ads were managed by DoubleClick. In tests, ScanSafe found that only 3 out of 41 antivirus vendors detected the malware. "To be honest, they were pretty clever in the way they carried this out," Landesman said. "They managed to infiltrate sites that enjoy very good traffic and they were able to use a mechanism for creating this pdf that caused it to be nearly completely undetected." This is not the first time Google's DoubleClick has been associated with this type of malicious advertising.

Solid-state storage earned a hot technology's badge of honor - a backlash - on Wednesday at the Diskcon conference in Santa Clara, California. Flash advocates claim they offer higher performance and greater reliability because there are no moving parts. Storage components based on NAND flash chips have recently been promoted as an alternative to spinning HDDs (hard disk drives) in netbooks, laptops, servers and enterprise storage platforms. But on Wednesday, even companies that are selling flash-based products cautioned that certain benefits may come only for certain applications or aren't here yet at all.

Workman, who helped create IBM's storage business, believes good engineering will eventually overcome flash's limitations but complained that the market today is consumed by hyperbole. "One of the claims is that because the SSD's solid-state, it's more reliable. It's "stupid" to use SSDs in a network-attached storage device that overwrites a large amount of data over and over, because of the tendency of flash chips to wear out every time data is written to them, said Mike Workman, chairman and CEO of storage equipment maker Pillar Data Systems. Bullshit. Pillar already offers flash options on its storage platforms. It's not," Workman told attendees. "I'll tell you right now, the data that I have in the lab, it should make the solid-state guys be embarrassed," he said. "The solid-state guys'll win," Workman said. "But they're not there yet." Workman's company didn't come to the conference as a rival to flash vendors.

But Workman emphasized that the new technology is just one component of an overall enterprise storage strategy. Flash chips deliver spectacular performance while in a "virgin" state, when the first bits are being written to them, but their write speed falls off dramatically within hours, as new bits are written over on the same silicon, said Esther Spanjer, Smart's director of SSD technical marketing. An executive of another seller of SSDs, flash chip vendor Smart Modular Technologies, issued her own caveats about them. Likewise, SSDs may run much faster on sequential than on random tasks, so a user's results will vary based on what kinds of loads their applications present, she said. The Storage Networking Industry Association and other organizations are working on these standards, she said.

Today, makers of flash silicon may test their products with any combination of tasks and configurations, because there are no standard benchmarks, she said. "Things are pretty much all over the map, and it can be very confusing" for makers of storage platforms that want to use flash in them, Spanjer said. A deal that Smart announced on Tuesday marked a breakthrough for a new approach to flash storage. Its controllers manage MLC (multilevel cell) flash, the high-volume, relatively inexpensive type used in consumer products such as portable media players. The company agreed to buy flash controllers from SandForce, which claims it has the technology to make flash price-competitive for a wide range of enterprise uses. Thad Omura, SandForce's vice president of marketing, told the conference that only MLC flash can compete with HDDs on cost. SLC flash stores only one bit per cell, so it packs less capacity into a given space.

Most enterprise products today use SLC (single-level cell) flash, which will never fall to the needed price levels because it's a specialized product, Omura believes. But this type is used on enterprise products because it's better-suited to both reading and writing data, and less prone to flaws that can reduce a chip's capacity over time. Smart will use the SandForce controllers in enterprise SSDs built with its MLC flash chips. SandForce's controllers are designed to manage MLC chips so they last longer. Enterprises may eventually embrace MLC flash, especially in products such as midpriced x86 servers, where buyers concentrate on price, said TrendFocus analyst John Chen, who spoke at Diskcon.

SandForce isn't alone in trying to leverage low-cost MLC silicon, with bigger vendors such as Marvell developing such controllers too, he said. But the controller's ability to prevent chip degradation will be key to flash storage, he added. "I think it's all about the controller," Chen said. The next big step will be for more vendors to qualify their flash storage products for enterprise environments, a process that should bear fruit next year, Chen said. Most of the major enterprise storage vendors have put flash offerings on the market this year, and the partnership announced last year between Intel and Hitachi Global Storage Technologies is on track to deliver its first products in the first half of next year, said Dean Amini, director of enterprise product marketing at Hitachi GST. Intel already sells flash silicon for enterprise storage. Despite these technical concerns, next year should be a big one for enterprise flash.

The companies plan to make flash products, in HDD form factors, that match the performance of Fibre Channel HDDs under any type of workload, according to Amini. The enterprise flash business is in such an early stage that the dominant provider of chips, STEC, even welcomes competitors. "The industry and the market is growing rapidly ... and I think adding another credible vendor, somebody that can pass the qualifications, will just increase the market even more," said Scott Stetzer, STEC's director of marketing for enterprise SSD products. A slide of technical goals showed they plan to offer advanced power management and MTBF (mean time between failures) of 2 million hours. Diskcon concludes on Thursday.

Legislators are trying to encourage cooperation among universities and businesses to develop technology needed to carry out a strategic government effort to fight cyber attacks.  Find out what is going on in university network security in our Alpha dogg blog. The Cybersecurity Research and Development Amendments Act of 2009 was approved today by the House Committee on Science and Technology's Research and Science Education Subcommittee. A U.S. House subcommittee is recommending a bill that calls for a university-industry task force to coordinate joint cybersecurity research and development projects between business and academia. The legislation would set up a scholarship program that pays college bills for students who study in fields related to cybersecurity.

In return the students would agree to work as cybersecurity professionals within the federal government for a period equal to the number of years they received scholarships. They would also get summer internships in the federal government. If there aren't any jobs there, they would work for state or local governments in the same capacity or teach cybersecurity courses. The task force would devise a way to build and maintain the infrastructure needed to create, test and implement new secure networking and IT systems. Language in the bill calls for fewer quick-fix actions and more strategic cybersecurity plans. 'In a series of hearings before Congress in 2009 experts testified that the federal cybersecurity research and development portfolio was too focused on short-term, incremental research," the bill says, "and that it lacked the prioritization and coordination necessary to address the long-term challenge of ensuring a secure and reliable information technology and communications infrastructure." A government task force would have to come up with a strategic plan within one year to prioritize research and development projects in cybersecurity that involve private businesses. It would also provide detailed spending priorities for federal agencies to meet these goals.

The program would also shepherd innovations from the research phase to implementation as new technologies and applications. The goal is to improve the security, reliability, resilience and trustworthiness of the national digital infrastructure. The legislation would give the president 180 days to list government cybersecurity staffing needs and to figure out how to meet them taking into consideration pay, the hiring process and hiring flexibility. The program would go beyond researching technology threats to address "social and behavioral factors including human-computer interactions, usability, user motivations and organizational cultures."

After a kick in the pants from the leader of the Linux driver project, Microsoft has resumed work on its historic driver code submission to the Linux kernel and avoided having the code pulled from the open source operating system. The submission was greeted with astonishment in July when Microsoft made the announcement, which included releasing the code under a GPLv2 license Microsoft had criticized in the past. Microsoft's submission includes 20,000 lines of code that once added to the Linux kernel will provide the hooks for any distribution of Linux to run on Windows Server 2008 and its Hyper-V hypervisor technology. Greg Kroah-Hartman, the Linux driver project lead who accepted the code from Microsoft in July, Wednesday called out Microsoft on the linux-kernel and driver-devel mailing lists saying the company was not actively developing its hv drivers.

If they do not show back up to claim this driver soon, it will be removed in the 2.6.33 [kernel] release. HV refers to Microsoft Hyper-V. He also posted the message to his blog. "Unfortunately the Microsoft developers seem to have disappeared, and no one is answering my emails. So sad...," he wrote. They are not the only company." Also new: Microsoft forms, funds open source foundation Kroah-Hartman said calling out specific projects on the mailing list is a technique he uses all the time to jump start those that are falling behind. Thursday, however, in an interview with Network World, Kroah-Hartman said Microsoft got the message. "They have responded since I posted," he said, and Microsoft is now back at work on the code they pledged to maintain. "This is a normal part of the development process. In all, Kroah-Hartman specifically mentioned 25 driver projects that were not being actively developed and faced being dropped from the main kernel release 2.6.33, which is due in March.

On top of chiding Microsoft for not keeping up with code development, Kroah-Hartman took the company to task for the state of its original code submission. "Over 200 patches make up the massive cleanup effort needed to just get this code into a semi-sane kernel coding style (someone owes me a big bottle of rum for that work!)," he wrote. He said the driver project was not a "dumping ground for dead code." However, the nearly 40 projects Kroah-Hartman detailed in his mailing list submission, including the Microsoft drivers, will all be included in the 2.6.32 main kernel release slated for December. Kroah-Hartman says there are coding style guidelines and that Microsoft's code did not match those. "That's normal and not a big deal. But the large number of patches did turn out to be quite a bit of work, he noted. It happens with a lot of companies," he said. He said Thursday that Microsoft still has not contributed any patches around the drivers. "They say they are going to contribute, but all they have submitted is changes to update the to-do list." Kroah-Hartman says he has seen this all before and seemed to chalk it up to the ebbs and flows of the development process.

The submission was greeted with astonishment in July when Microsoft made the announcement, which included releasing the code under a GPLv2 license Microsoft had criticized in the past. Microsoft's submission includes 20,000 lines of code that once added to the Linux kernel will provide the hooks for any distribution of Linux to run on Windows Server 2008 and its Hyper-V hypervisor technology. Follow John on Twitter

It turns out that Apple's iPhone 3.1 OS fix of a serious security issue - falsely reporting to Exchange servers that pre-3G S iPhones and iPod Touches had on-device encryption - wasn't the first such policy falsehood that Apple has quietly fixed in an OS upgrade. Before that update, the iPhone falsely reported its adherence to VPN policies, specifically those that confirm the device is not saving the VPN password (so users are forced to enter it manually). Until the iPhone 3.0 OS update, users could save VPN passwords on their Apple devices, yet the iPhone OS would report to the VPN server that the passwords were not being saved. It fixed a similar lie in its June iPhone OS 3.0 update. The fact of the iPhones' false reporting of their adherence to Exchange and VPN policies has caused some organizations to revoke or suspend plans for iPhone support, several readers who did not want their names or agencies identified told InfoWorld.

Worse, it revealed that Apple's iconic devices have been unknowingly violating such policies for more than a year. "My guess is the original decision to emulate hardware encryption was made at a level where there wasn't much awareness of enterprise IT standards. One reader at a large government agency describes the IT leader there as "being bitten by the change," after taking a risk to support the popular devices. "I guess we will all have to start distrusting Apple," said another reader at a different agency. [ Apple's snafu on the iPhone OS's policy adherence could kill the iPhone's chances of ever being trusted again by IT, argues InfoWorld's Galen Gruman. ] Last week's iPhone OS 3.1 update began correctly reporting the on-device encryption and VPN password-saving status when queried by Exchange and VPN policy servers, which made thousands of iPhones noncompliant with those policies and thus blocked from their networks. (Only the new iPhone 3G S has on-device encryption.) Apple's document on the iPhone OS 3.1 update's security changes neglected to mention this fix, catching users and IT administrators off-guard. After all, this is a foreign language for Apple," says Ezra Gottheil, an analyst at Technology Business Research. "However, once the company realized the problem, it made a spectacularly dumb choice. Instead, it allowed itself to be seen in the worst possible light. The change was necessary and inevitable, but Apple could have earned some points by coming clean at the earliest opportunity.

This is the result of a colossal clash of cultures. Even when it is trying, Apple cannot force itself to think like an enterprise vendor." Apple's advice to users on addressing the Exchange encryption policy issue is to either remove that policy requirement for iPhone users or replace users' devices with the iPhone 3G S. IT organizations can also consider using third-party mobile management tools that enforce security and compliance policies; several now support the iPhone to varying degrees, including those from Good Technology, MobileIron, and Zenprise.

Netbook sales keep growing, as do the sizes of their displays.

Of the tiny laptops available today, eight out of 10 have LCD screens between 10 inches and 11.6 inches in size, according to an analysis published Monday by the blog, UMPC Portal. That is up from seven out of 10 laptops four months earlier, according to UMPC's research.

Screens between the narrow band of 10 inches and 10.2-inches dominated, available on 61% of all notebooks under 12 inches in size, according to data in the German/Austrian price comparison engine, Geizhals.at that was first reported by UMPC Portal. That includes both smaller notebooks as well as netbooks, which tend to use Intel Corp.'s Atom CPU and lack components such as DVD drives.

The popularity of 10-inch and 10.2-inch screens falls in line with predictions by iSuppli Corp., which expects 10-inch to 10.9-inch screens to make up 55% of the netbook market this year.

Larger screen sizes, such as 11.1 inch or 11.6-inch models, are more expensive and are produced by fewer vendors, according to iSuppli.

Nevertheless, about one in five of all models sported screens between 10.4 inches and 11.9 inches in size.

Those computers, which mostly run Windows XP today, would run afoul of Microsoft's attempts to segment the laptop market. The software maker intends to restrict availability of the less-expensive Starter Edition of Windows 7 to netbooks that, among other limitations, have screens no larger than 10.2-inches in size.

Meanwhile, the 7-inch screen, which shipped on the original netbook, Asustek Inc.'s Eee 701 almost two years ago, is nearly extinct. Only four out of 280 models are available with that size of screen. Altogether, less than 4% of models have screens 7-inches or smaller.

Geizhal's statistics include both netbooks running Intel's Atom processor as well as mini-laptops sporting more powerful single and dual-core CPUs from Intel or AMD Inc. The 8.9-inch screen, which as recently as last year was the favored form factor, made up only 10% of models in Geizhal's database.

The percentage of mini-notebook models running Linux instead of Windows remained steady at 8.5%, according to UMPC Portal, or about one in 12. That practically mirrors statistics earlier this year that broke down down actual shipments of Windows versus Linux netbooks.

A new service pack for SAP's flagship BusinessObjects BI (business intelligence) platform is reportedly taking an exceedingly long time to install on Windows machines, presenting significant logistical problems, according to angry users posting gripes on an independent message board.

"I had to cancel the installation on our DEV box after 18 hours," user 'RGeurts' wrote last week about the pack, which is for BusinessObjects XI 3.1. "Does anyone know if BO will release a more stable release of SP2. Because an 18-hour installation of a service pack seems to be totally unacceptable for me. We simply cannot have the DEV box down for that long."

Another poster called the pack "a joke," expressing shock and bewilderment at its sluggish install process.

"Kicked it off at 9:00 this morning with no anti-virus running and ran it in quiet mode on a server doing nothing," 'clarej' wrote. "Seven hours later and it's just finished gathering information. What information is it gathering in that time? The complete history of the universe and everything in it maybe?"

Like RGeurts, clarej cited job difficulties caused by the slowly installing pack.

"I have an upgrade to do of our Prod servers from [platform version] XI2 and there are three servers. Taking into account that I have to install XI3.1 three times, configure it and then upgrade to SP2 and possibly FP1.8 there ain't gonna be enough time over a weekend."

Another user had better luck after experimenting with different system configurations.

"I have been testing with Win2003 and got 7-18 hours installations, based on the number of language packs," user 'bobano' wrote. "I installed a win2008 server, with identical system properties, and the SP2 installed in less then 4 hours (with one language)! Does win2008 have a different version of the Windows installer?"

In a statement, an SAP official acknowledged, "the install for Windows is very time-intensive."

"We were aware of this issue, which does not exist on the Linux and Unix platform versions, but decided to go ahead and release it to make the benefits of the latest Service Pack immediately available to Windows platform customers as well," said Franz Aman, vice president of intelligence platform product marketing. "The issue is documented in the release notes."

The problem is connected with a Windows install routine, according to Aman. "To avoid this in the future, we have an alternative approach that we will deploy in the next Service Pack release, SP3. Customers have the option of installing SP2 now if they have a compelling reason to do so, or they can move to SP3 when that becomes available."

TechCrunch concluded its days-long drip of stolen Twitter documents with details on the company's conversations with Google and Microsoft.

In the process, TechCrunch is showing a bit of softness toward Twitter, saying that the rawness of the documents show "the dedication and deep commitment of this team to making Twitter into a world-class company."

There's a lot of nitty gritty in these documents, but the big picture shows Twitter spending a lot of energy on, well, everything. The company worries about Google, and how it can either beat the search giant at finding tweets or provide an application programming interface to Google and large corporations. Facebook comes up, with executives worrying about the various ways Twitter could be buried by the bigger social networking site.

Execs also discuss VIP users like Shaq and Diddy, with the possibility of giving them "advisor shares." Twitter isn't turning a blind eye to the groundswell of third-party Twitter apps, either. In meetings, Twitter executives talk about acquiring or supporting Twitpic, Photobucket, and Tweetie.

Of course, business models are discussed from various angles, with possibilities that include AdSense widgets and sponsored tweets. The overarching goal is to reach 1 billion users and monetize a small amount on each of them.

Overall, Twitter comes off well in TechCrunch's grand leak finale. In public, the company has been cagey about its business strategy and how it will play with others who want a piece of its user base, but it seems no stone is being left unturned behind closed doors. The images surfaced courtesy of a hacker who wanted to demonstrate how easily he broke into a Twitter exec's Gmail account and obtained Google docs.

TwitterGate may be over on TechCrunch's end, but it'll continue to resonate now that Twitter's secrets and strategies are out in the open. How Twitter and TechCrunch can get along from here depends on who you ask. Behind the scenes, the two Web sites have been talking about the "right way" to go about releasing the documents, TechCrunch writer Erick Schonfeld said, and the tech Web site will explain that process in the coming days.

The other possibility is a lawsuit. We've discussed how that's certainly not out of the question. For now, let's all take a deep breath and get back to tweeting - or decrying it as an overhyped, undercooked version of Facebook.

Comcast just became the wireless Internet vendor to beat by offering 4G wireless Internet in Portland, Oregon. Leveraging Clearwire's WiMax network, this move leaves LTE (Long-Term Evolution), the competing technology, a step behind.

The new service, called Comcast High-Speed 2go, offers speeds of up to 4Mbps. The Fast Pack Metro package is aggressively sold at an introductory rate of $49.99 a month, which also includes a 12Mbps home Internet service and a free Wi-Fi router. After the first year, the rate jumps to a still-competitive $73 per month. An additional $20 adds nationwide 3G data service to the package, provided by Sprint Nextel (the majority owner of Clearwire). Existing Comcast broadband customers can pick up the service for an additional $30 for local and $50 for nationwide.

The offer bests Verizon Wireless's current offering of 3G wireless Internet with speeds ranging from 600kbps to1.4Mpbs and a 5GB cap ($.05 per MB after) for $59.95 per month.

Comcast intends to launch the service in Chicago, Atlanta, and Philadelphia by the end of 2009. Clearwire additionally intends to deploy WiMax in Las Vegas, Charlotte, Dallas, and Honolulu later this year.

This bold move beats LTE to market and gives Comcast a competitive edge in the rapidly changing wireless broadband market.

WiMax is a competitor to the emerging LTE standard, which is supported by Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile. While LTE could potentially offer speeds of 5 to 10Mbs, WiMax is headed for early market dominance and it could take years for LTE to catch up. Both networks are IP-based and were designed to move data rather than voice. WiMax is based on open standards, and the equipment is therefore cheaper to make.

It's speculated that eventually the networks could merge, giving customers more options for nationwide service.

Either way, this is a win for customers who hunger for faster wireless connectivity. With the Internet becoming the default channel for distributing video and voice communications, and laptops and netbooks dominating the PC market, people are demanding faster Internet 2go. So far, Comcast and Clearwire are holding the ace.

Michael Scalisi is an IT manager based in Alameda, California.

The next version of Firefox will include next-generation features Mozilla hopes will help the browser stand apart from competitors.

Firefox 3.5, which is due out in final release at the end of the month, will allow people to edit digital images from within the browser without need for a third-party application, thanks to a new Javascript engine Mozilla has built for the browser, said Mike Beltzner, director of Firefox at Mozilla, during an interview in New York.

The software also will include the ability to run videos directly in the browser without the need for a third-party viewer or player, and will allow other elements of a Web page to interact with that video content, he said.

As an open-source company, Mozilla aims to give people technologies based on open standards that help them leverage the Web as both a content-delivery engine and platform for developing applications, Beltzner said.

"The more people we see using Firefox as their modern, standards-compliant browser, the better it is for the Web as an ecosystem," he said.

The new Javascript engine, called TraceMonkey, is twice as fast as the one in Firefox 3.0, and allows for image editing from within the browser without need for software such as Adobe Photoshop, Beltzner said. Javascript is a standard scripting language for Web applications.

"We can do this just as well with an online Web application as well as you could on a local application," he said, thanks to TraceMonkey. "Especially for those complex, power-hungry Web applications, people will find Firefox 3.5 a lot faster."

Similarly, the new video capability is based on the open-source video codec called Ogg, maintained by the Xiph.Org Foundation, so it is built on technology freely available for both Web users and developers.

Video written for the Ogg codec can be played within Firefox 3.5 without a separate media player, Beltzner said. Moreover, to develop video to be played within the browser, developers don't have to license proprietary codecs from the vendors that own them, as they do with Flash Player or other proprietary-player content, Beltzner said.

Firefox 3.5 also allows developers to build applications for other parts of a Web page that can interact with the video playing, which has potential for enhancing next-generation Web-based applications such as advertising campaigns as well as enterprise applications, he said.

Currently, video technology is coded separately from other Web-site assets and there is no interaction between them, he added.

For example, if someone is watching a television program on Hulu.com that is written to the Ogg codec and likes a shirt a character is wearing, Firefox 3.5 will allow that person to click on the shirt and see links to sites where it can be purchased, Beltzner said.

Al Hilwa, a program director for analyst firm IDC, said any technology that provides more options for online advertisers and developers to take advantage of the Web as an advertising and content-delivery system are certainly worth a second look and do differentiate Firefox from competitors.

However, he said due to Firefox's scant market share compared to Microsoft's Internet Explorer - which remains the leading browser - it's too soon to tell whether anyone will take advantage of Firefox 3.5's new technology.

"I think it remains to be seen whether that's going to attract various content providers or Web sites that know full well they will only reach 15 percent of [Web] users, because that's how many people will have Firefox in the short term," he said.

A preview of Firefox 3.5 is available now, but Mozilla delayed the first release candidate that was scheduled for this week until next week to iron out some last-minute bugs. The final release of the browser is still expected at the end of the month.

Verizon Business took its next step toward deploying 100Gbps by trialing its 100G optical service with the United Kingdom's national research and education network, JANET.  

Verizon says it finished the trial in April after it sent 100G signals simultaneously with 10G and 40G optical signals over a 103-kilometer section of its global network located between London and Reading in the United Kingdom. The carrier tested the service in collaboration with JANET, the UK's network that is used to support bandwidth-intensive educational and research project and that consists of a backbone and 19 regional networks.

The test successfully showed that different optical signals "can be carried simultaneously without impact [and that] current networks can be upgraded to the higher bandwidth without modification to the physical network," Verizon says. The company purposely introduced signal impairments during its trial over JANET to see if they could be corrected by electronic hardware.

Verizon Business is planning to upgrade its major routes in the United States to 100Gbps next year. Verizon first tested its 100G capabilities in 2007 when it transmitted a live video feed over 312 miles from Tampa to Miami. Joseph Cook, Verizon Business' vice president for global network engineering, said the 100G test "showed us that we could deploy 100G on routes and not disrupt current wavelengths."

100G networks are seen by many as a logical progression from the current standard of 10G Ethernet. In 2006, the IEEE's Higher Speed Study Group (HSSG) voted to pursue 100G Ethernet as its next major Ethernet standard. The HSSG said last summer that it was aiming to have a single standard developed that covered both 40G and 100G speeds by 2010, marking the first time that an Ethernet standards group had agreed to create one standard for two different speeds.